Software Asset Management (SAM) Blog

Software Noncompliance



The Cost of Noncompliance
Being found to be in noncompliance for sofware in use in an organisation by a third party i.e. a software vendor or industry body such as The Business Software Alliance (BSA) will be far more expensive than undertaking this exercise as an internal project. Noncompliance can be costly. Organisations that are out of compliance not only have to settle up with the manufacturers, but they may also have to pay fines that can total in the region of £100,000 per infraction.

Organisations that do not focus on software compliance risk even more-costly audits from other software vendors, which tend to follow one another in auditing organisations that don’t have a handle on compliance.
The good news is that periodic audits are easy to do, are relatively inexpensive-and can offer major cost benefits. Have a look at the case study at:

http://www.centennial-software.com/images/upload/Telegraph_%20Centennial.pdf

which clearly demonstrates the potential cost savings to taking control of compliance rather than wait to be audited.

Read the rest of this entry »

Digg It!!

Blog Calander

July 2007
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Categories

SAM in the News

Crimes in the Online Arena Must Match Those in the Physical
November 17, 2008 - Quanta Security

Corporate UK facing compliance time bomb during a period of economic uncertainty!
November 14, 2008 - News Blaze

Users offered SaaS asset management
November 10, 2008 - Computerworld UK

UK businesses 'struggle with software asset management'
November 7, 2008 - CIO

Getting SAM right
September 25, 2008 - Server Management

Software lobby groups join forces
September 2, 2008 - CIO

BSA hangs pirate out to dry
September 1, 2008 - Active Home

Silverstone at full speed with Softcat IT contract
August 29, 2008 - Computing.co.uk


Archives

Links